Fake Profile Reviews

[BarryD]

I know, sorry lol, didn't mean it like that �� I know how we got started I meant how did Barry get started.
Words. Brian Cox. Bye x

being told to F off by SP for a start, the latest a middle finger icon on sig.

You and I both know that when you look at a provider and she has rats in her reviews, you assume that she has something to do with it. When you see a rat on a review, you assume that particular review is fake. People don't research the EI User Manual to dissect the rules and regulations, and EI is so opaque anyway (with their actions seeming to be completely inconsistent with whatever rules have been excavated) that it's difficult not to draw wrong conclusions. The rat does affect the provider and EI lets it sit there like a shitty towel on the door.

This whole thread is demonstrative of that with two girls being given the no-smoke no-fire treatment with zero evidence they've done anything wrong.
Little inner circles of kiss-arses and fanboys are now using this to shoot darts at their princess's supposed rivals. All very childish and insensitive to the effects that has.

For the record, I've never met Dora or Dieve.

But people on this thread and others have used this and the insinuations around reviews not counting towards EOTM to make snidey remarks about the providers. Rather than minimising that by taking a technocratic analysis of the rules, I'm happy to call it out.

and so the shitty towel should stay as it's a potential fake review with the provider potentially involved.

the irony - kiss-arse/fanboy yourself. childish/insensitive/snidey remarks
nothing more childish than this sad shit. whats good for the goose is good for the gander. All achieved/done

[IAmLIAm]

being told to F off by SP for a start, the latest a middle finger icon on sig.

Are you upset that many of the members here ask questions and seek clarity when things don't seem to add up or to better understand a situation? Does it bother you so deeply that people want fact based analysis rather than rampant speculation and theories of a grand conspiracy? Are you upset that an SP took offense at you making a baseless character assassination attempt so she modified my post to show her displeasure?

You yourself modify quote replies (along with multi-quoting out of context and non-sequential multi-quoting) to try and impose your agenda, so I'm confused as to why that would upset you so much now. You even made the argument that there's nothing inherently wrong in doing so (which I do personally find to be troubling as it is in fact deceitful and undermines any integrity that may be had in an argument/discussion).

While the modification isn't my quote verbatim and actually isn't the intended tone, I do understand that it could be interpreted as such. However, it is so out of context that it also doesn't really mean anything to anyone other than the 3 people involved (and if anyone else was curious about it they can use the click-through and find the full context). It's kind of like my current sig. Sure it was part of a larger discussion but it absolutely makes no sense on it's own.

and so the shitty towel should stay as it's a potential fake review with the provider potentially involved.

the irony - kiss-arse/fanboy yourself. childish/insensitive/snidey remarks
nothing more childish than this sad shit. whats good for the goose is good for the gander. All achieved/done

Are you taking credit for something? Because it almost reads like you're taking credit for something and that something seems to be in retaliation for your ego being bruised....

If you are taking credit, why not just come out and say it?
If you're not patting yourself on the back, why keep grandstanding? You truly are an enigma wrapped in a conundrum and shrouded in mystery. Not sure how anyone could ever hope to crack the code.

Have a nice walk 🖕😼🖕

(Issue resolved)